Remove Vince call gets louder
Opposition to Dr. Vince Henderson's nomination in Thursday's by-election in Grand Bay grows but the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal may have ruled on a similar case in 1997
In spite of a 1995 Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal ruling in a similar case, the nomination of Dr. Vince Henderson as the Dominica Labour Party (DLP) candidate in this week's by-election in Grand Bay continues to be challenged. The voices are getting louder as the election gets closer.
For instance, the newly-formed National Joint Action Movement (NJAM) last week called for Dr. Henderson to be barred from the November 25, 2021, by-election in Grand Bay.
In a statement issued on November 19, 2021, the group says, it considers the behavior of Dr. Henderson an "insult" to the Dominican people and to the people of the United States of America (USA) and the Organization of American States (OAS), to which he was accredited as ambassador to represent the people of the Commonwealth of Dominica.
NJAM claims Dr. Henderson still represented Dominica at an OAS Virtual Conference in Guatemala from November 10th to 12th, 2021, as Dominica's Permanent Representative, together with Foreign Affairs Minister, Hon Kenneth Darroux and other government officials.
"Unconfirmed reports also indicate that the State Department still has Mr. Vince Henderson on its register of ambassadors accredited to the United States of America, up to this present moment," the group said.
NJAM issued a call to the DLP candidate to make public the evidence of his resignation and acknowledgment of the same in order to confirm that he did resign before Nomination Day on 9th November 2021.
NJAM further deemed Dr. Henderson's candidacy as "offensive, immoral and unethical" and appealed to "the God-fearing citizens of the Commonwealth of Dominica to join the proposed legal action against Mr. Vince Henderson to force him to present evidence that he is duly nominated as a candidate for the Grand Bay bye-election scheduled for November 25th, 2021; to prevent a crime
Leader, Lennox Linton, has formally written to the Chairman of the Electoral Commission, Duncan Stowe, also seeking to have Dr. Henderson interdicted.
Early Linton wrote to the Chief of Police Daniel Carbon but having received no response, he appealed to the constitutionally appointed authority with responsibility for conducting the elections to "to ensure that Mr. Henderson is barred from contesting the Grand Bay by-election in which he is not qualified to participate by operation of law."
Linton argued that the nation's Constitution and electoral laws prohibit anyone in the public service, and/or in a position of emolument in service to the State, from membership in the House of Assembly.
"Your investigation of this matter should therefore give very careful consideration to items 2, 5 and 8 on Form 13 of House of Assembly (Elections) Act Ch. 2:01 – Statutory Declaration of a Person Nominated as a Candidate for Election as a Member of the House of Assembly," Linton wrote.
He urged Stowe to act with urgency and the appropriate dispatch in "investigating and resolving this matter in the enlightened public interest of safeguarding the electoral process from criminality and rule of law violations."
The Sun tried contacting Stowe, to no avail, as the newspaper was informed that the Commission took certain actions after Stowe received Linton's letter. Meantime, Senior Counsel (SC) Anthony Astaphan has come to the defense of Dr. Henderson, deeming Linton's letters as baseless and another ploy by the United Workers Party (UWP) to raise funds.
"It's another scam," he stated. "It's another fabrication created within the mindset of Lennox Linton."
According to the Astaphan, based on a ruling by the Court of Appeal in the 1997 Charles Savarin v John Williams matter, this form of disqualification only applies to public servants.
The case of 3rd July 1995 involved a voter's request for the court to disqualify Charles Savarin as the winner of the election in Roseau Central because, as the manager of the National Development Corporation (NDC), he was in the employ of the government and hence was automatically disqualified, according to the Constitution, from being a member of the House of Assembly.
But the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal disagreed.
"By virtue of that Constitutional meaning, a person holds or acts in an office or appointment in a branch of the Public Service of Dominica if and only if he was appointed to or is dismissible from that office by or in accordance with the advice of the Public Service Commission or the Judicial and Legal Services Commission," wrote Chief Justice Sir Vincent Floissac, in the 17-page judgement. "In my judgment, the appellant did not hold or act in an office or appointment in a branch of the Public Service of Dominica".
A possible question for the courts, therefore, is whether Dr. Henderson's current situation is similar (or not) to Savarin's in 1997.