Dominicans should make the distinction between buggery an immoral, abominable act and the legality of that act.

Speaking at a public lecture at the Fort Young Hotel last week, organised by the Catholic Church on Faith and the Legal System, Former Chief Justice Sir Brian Alleyne said the law against buggery is imprecise and could be applied to anal sex between not only a man and a man but also between a man and a woman or a man and an animal.

"I need not emphasise the fact that not all immoral acts are illegal and certainly not all attract criminal sanctions of ten years imprisonment," Sir Brian said. "Clearly, in my opinion, whether between a man and a woman or between a man and another man or between a man and an animal it is immoral. There's no question about that".

He added: "What I question is whether the act between consenting adults in the privacy of their bedroom should be criminalised and whether it should attract a term of imprisonment of up to ten years. I am happy that the Vatican as well as our bishop has expressed the same view."

Dominica's Sexual Offenses Act 1998 has two sections dealing with same-sex sexual activity. Section 14. (1) states that any person who commits an act of gross indecency with another person is guilty of an offence and liable upon conviction to imprisonment for five years. In this section, "gross indecency" is an act other than sexual intercourse (whether natural or unnatural) by a person involving the use of the genital organ for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire.

Section 16. (1) adds that a person who commits buggery is guilty of an offence and liable upon conviction to imprisonment for (a) twenty-five years, if committed by an adult on a minor (b) ten years, if committed by an adult on another adult; (c) five years, if committed by a minor; and if the Court thinks it fit, the Court may order that the convicted person be admitted to a psychiatric hospital for treatment.

It continues: Any person who attempts to commit the offence of buggery, or is guilty of an assault with intent to commit the same, is guilty of an offence and liable to imprisonment for four years, and, if the Court thinks it fit, the Court may order that the convicted person be admitted to a psychiatric hospital for treatment.

Recently gay rights advocates have called for the repeal of the law against buggery but there has been a stringent argument from church –based groups that the law should remain on the books. In response, Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit stated that his government would not repeal the law.

Sir Brian said the act of buggery is immoral but he questioned whether "we should prosecute a man and a woman who engage in anal sex, the abominable act of buggery in the privacy of their own bedroom".

"To say no is not to validate the act, it is to respect the privacy of the individuals while retaining the condemnation of the immoral act as we condemn all immoral acts," he said.